Cover for On the Origin of Species

Project Gutenberg #1228

On the Origin of Species

Charles Darwin

1859

Darwin's argument for descent with modification and natural selection, prepared chapter by chapter from Project Gutenberg HTML.

Project Gutenberg #1228 Public domain in the United States Cover source Local typographic cover created for MojiMori from public-domain source metadata

Section 11 of 15 Page 6 of 6

On the Geological Succession of Organic Beings

37 words at B2 or above
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 C2+
highlighted at or above your level

AI Summary

Chapter 11 — On the Geological Succession of Organic Beings Central question Why do fossils appear in a historical sequence that resembles branching descent? Main argument Darwin argues that the order of fossil...

markdown
groups previously classed as distinct into one; but more commonly only bringing them a little closer together. The more ancient a form is, the more often, apparently, it displays characters in some degree intermediate between groups now distinct; for the more ancient a form is, the more nearly it will be related to, and consequently resemble, the common progenitor of groups, since become widely divergent. Extinct forms are seldom directly intermediate between existing forms; but are intermediate only by a long and circuitous course through many extinct and very different forms. We can clearly see why the organic remains of closely consecutive formations are more closely allied to each other, than are those of remote formations; for the forms are more closely linked together by generation: we can clearly see why the remains of an intermediate formation are intermediate in character. The inhabitants of each successive period in the world's history have beaten their predecessors in the race for life, and are, in so far, higher in the scale of nature; and this may account for that vague yet ill-defined sentiment, felt by many palaeontologists, that organisation on the whole has progressed. If it should hereafter be proved that ancient animals resemble to a certain extent the embryos of more recent animals of the same class, the fact will be intelligible. The succession of the same types of structure within the same areas during the later geological periods ceases to be mysterious, and is simply explained by inheritance. If then the geological record be as imperfect as I believe it to be, and it may at least be asserted that the record cannot be proved to be much more perfect, the main objections to the theory of natural selection are greatly diminished or disappear. On the other hand, all the chief laws of palaeontology plainly proclaim, as it seems to me, that species have been produced by ordinary generation: old forms having been supplanted by new and improved forms of life, produced by the laws of variation still acting round us, and preserved by Natural Selection.

Send feedback

Optional — only if you'd like a reply.