Project Gutenberg #1999
Crome Yellow
Aldous Huxley
1921Huxley's country-house satire, prepared chapter by chapter from Project Gutenberg plaintext for vocabulary-focused reading.
Project Gutenberg #1999 Public domain in the United States Cover source Local typographic cover created for MojiMori from public-domain source metadata
203
words at B2 or above
A1
A2
B1
B2
C1
C2
C2+
highlighted
at or above your level
AI Summary
Chapter 12 — CHAPTER XII. Central question Why does Denis’s talk with Mary go wrong? Main argument Denis’s ironic, evasive language frustrates Mary’s wish for seriousness and recognition. Her disappointment is...
Blight, Mildew, and Smut...” Mary was puzzled and distressed. Perhaps
her ears had played her false. Perhaps what he had really said was,
“Squire, Binyon, and Shanks,” or “Childe, Blunden, and Earp,” or even
“Abercrombie, Drinkwater, and Rabindranath Tagore.” Perhaps. But then
her ears never did play her false. “Blight, Mildew, and Smut.” The
impression was distinct and ineffaceable. “Blight, Mildew...” she was
forced to the conclusion, reluctantly, that Denis had indeed pronounced
those improbable words. He had deliberately repelled her attempts to
open a serious discussion. That was horrible. A man who would not talk
seriously to a woman just because she was a woman--oh, impossible!
Egeria or nothing. Perhaps Gombauld would be more satisfactory. True,
his meridional heredity was a little disquieting; but at least he was
a serious worker, and it was with his work that she would associate
herself. And Denis? After all, what WAS Denis? A dilettante, an
amateur...
Gombauld had annexed for his painting-room a little disused granary that
stood by itself in a green close beyond the farm-yard. It was a square
brick building with a peaked roof and little windows set high up in each
of its walls. A ladder of four rungs led up to the door; for the granary
was perched above the ground, and out of reach of the rats, on four
massive toadstools of grey stone. Within, there lingered a faint smell
of dust and cobwebs; and the narrow shaft of sunlight that came slanting
in at every hour of the day through one of the little windows was
always alive with silvery motes. Here Gombauld worked, with a kind of
concentrated ferocity, during six or seven hours of each day. He was
pursuing something new, something terrific, if only he could catch it.
During the last eight years, nearly half of which had been spent in the
process of winning the war, he had worked his way industriously through
cubism. Now he had come out on the other side. He had begun by painting
a formalised nature; then, little by little, he had risen from nature
into the world of pure form, till in the end he was painting nothing but
his own thoughts, externalised in the abstract geometrical forms of
the mind’s devising. He found the process arduous and exhilarating. And
then, quite suddenly, he grew dissatisfied; he felt himself cramped and
confined within intolerably narrow limitations. He was humiliated to
find how few and crude and uninteresting were the forms he could invent;
the inventions of nature were without number, inconceivably subtle and
elaborate. He had done with cubism. He was out on the other side. But
the cubist discipline preserved him from falling into excesses of nature
worship. He took from nature its rich, subtle, elaborate forms, but his
aim was always to work them into a whole that should have the thrilling
simplicity and formality of an idea; to combine prodigious realism
with prodigious simplification. Memories of Caravaggio’s portentous
achievements haunted him. Forms of a breathing, living reality emerged
from darkness, built themselves up into compositions as luminously
simple and single as a mathematical idea. He thought of the “Call of
Matthew,” of “Peter Crucified,” of the “Lute players,” of “Magdalen.”
He had the secret, that astonishing ruffian, he had the secret! And
now Gombauld was after it, in hot pursuit. Yes, it would be something
terrific, if only he could catch it.
For a long time an idea had been stirring and spreading, yeastily,
in his mind. He had made a portfolio full of studies, he had drawn a
cartoon; and now the idea was taking shape on canvas. A man fallen from
a horse. The huge animal, a gaunt white cart-horse, filled the upper
half of the picture with its great body. Its head, lowered towards the
ground, was in shadow; the immense bony body was what arrested the eye,
the body and the legs, which came down on either side of the picture
like the pillars of an arch. On the ground, between the legs of the
towering beast, lay the foreshortened figure of a man, the head in the
extreme foreground, the arms flung wide to right and left. A white,
relentless light poured down from a point in the right foreground. The
beast, the fallen man, were sharply illuminated; round them, beyond and
behind them, was the night. They were alone in the darkness, a universe
in themselves. The horse’s body filled the upper part of the picture;
the legs, the great hoofs, frozen to stillness in the midst of their
trampling, limited it on either side. And beneath lay the man,
his foreshortened face at the focal point in the centre, his arms
outstretched towards the sides of the picture. Under the arch of the
horse’s belly, between his legs, the eye looked through into an intense
darkness; below, the space was closed in by the figure of the prostrate
man. A central gulf of darkness surrounded by luminous forms...
The picture was more than half finished. Gombauld had been at work all
the morning on the figure of the man, and now he was taking a rest--the
time to smoke a cigarette. Tilting back his chair till it touched the
wall, he looked thoughtfully at his canvas. He was pleased, and at the
same time he was desolated. In itself, the thing was good; he knew
it. But that something he was after, that something that would be so
terrific if only he could catch it--had he caught it? Would he ever
catch it?
Three little taps--rat, tat, tat! Surprised, Gombauld turned his eyes
towards the door. Nobody ever disturbed him while he was at work; it
was one of the unwritten laws. “Come in!” he called. The door, which was
ajar, swung open, revealing, from the waist upwards, the form of Mary.
She had only dared to mount half-way up the ladder. If he didn’t want
her, retreat would be easier and more dignified than if she climbed to
the top.
“May I come in?” she asked.
“Certainly.”
She skipped up the remaining two rungs and was over the threshold in
an instant. “A letter came for you by the second post,” she said. “I
thought it might be important, so I brought it out to you.” Her eyes,
her childish face were luminously candid as she handed him the letter.
There had never been a flimsier pretext.
Gombauld looked at the envelope and put it in his pocket unopened.
“Luckily,” he said, “it isn’t at all important. Thanks very much all the
same.”
There was a silence; Mary felt a little uncomfortable. “May I have a
look at what you’ve been painting?” she had the courage to say at last.
Gombauld had only half smoked his cigarette; in any case he wouldn’t
begin work again till he had finished. He would give her the five
minutes that separated him from the bitter end. “This is the best place
to see it from,” he said.
Mary looked at the picture for some time without saying anything.
Indeed, she didn’t know what to say; she was taken aback, she was at a
loss. She had expected a cubist masterpiece, and here was a picture of a
man and a horse, not only recognisable as such, but even aggressively
in drawing. Trompe-l’oeil--there was no other word to describe the
delineation of that foreshortened figure under the trampling feet of the
horse. What was she to think, what was she to say? Her orientations
were gone. One could admire representationalism in the Old Masters.
Obviously. But in a modern...? At eighteen she might have done so.
But now, after five years of schooling among the best judges, her
instinctive reaction to a contemporary piece of representation was
contempt--an outburst of laughing disparagement. What could Gombauld be
up to? She had felt so safe in admiring his work before. But now--she
didn’t know what to think. It was very difficult, very difficult.
“There’s rather a lot of chiaroscuro, isn’t there?” she ventured at
last, and inwardly congratulated herself on having found a critical
formula so gentle and at the same time so penetrating.
“There is,” Gombauld agreed.
Mary was pleased; he accepted her criticism; it was a serious
discussion. She put her head on one side and screwed up her eyes.
“I think it’s awfully fine,” she said. “But of course it’s a little
too...too...trompe-l’oeil for my taste.” She looked at Gombauld, who
made no response, but continued to smoke, gazing meditatively all the
time at his picture. Mary went on gaspingly. “When I was in Paris this
spring I saw a lot of Tschuplitski. I admire his work so tremendously.
Of course, it’s frightfully abstract now--frightfully abstract and
frightfully intellectual. He just throws a few oblongs on to his
canvas--quite flat, you know, and painted in pure primary colours. But
his design is wonderful. He’s getting more and more abstract every day.
He’d given up the third dimension when I was there and was just thinking
of giving up the second. Soon, he says, there’ll be just the blank
canvas. That’s the logical conclusion. Complete abstraction. Painting’s
finished; he’s finishing it. When he’s reached pure abstraction he’s
going to take up architecture. He says it’s more intellectual than
painting. Do you agree?” she asked, with a final gasp.
Gombauld dropped his cigarette end and trod on it. “Tschuplitski’s
finished painting,” he said. “I’ve finished my cigarette. But I’m going
on painting.” And, advancing towards her, he put his arm round her
shoulders and turned her round, away from the picture.
Mary looked up at him; her hair swung back, a soundless bell of gold.
Her eyes were serene; she smiled. So the moment had come. His arm was
round her. He moved slowly, almost imperceptibly, and she moved with
him. It was a peripatetic embracement. “Do you agree with him?” she
repeated. The moment might have come, but she would not cease to be
intellectual, serious.
“I don’t know. I shall have to think about it.” Gombauld loosened his
embrace, his hand dropped from her shoulder. “Be careful going down the
ladder,” he added solicitously.
Mary looked round, startled. They were in front of the open door. She
remained standing there for a moment in bewilderment. The hand that
had rested on her shoulder made itself felt lower down her back; it
administered three or four kindly little smacks. Replying automatically
to its stimulus, she moved forward.
“Be careful going down the ladder,” said Gombauld once more.
She was careful. The door closed behind her and she was alone in the
little green close. She walked slowly back through the farmyard; she was
pensive.