Skip to main content

We're in Beta! Found a bug? Let us know using the feedback button at the bottom right.

↑↓ navigate ↵ open esc close
Cover for Discoveries and Inventions of the Nineteenth Century

Project Gutenberg #54475

Discoveries and Inventions of the Nineteenth Century

Robert Routledge

1900

Routledge's illustrated survey of nineteenth-century engineering and invention, prepared chapter by chapter from Project Gutenberg HTML.

Project Gutenberg #54475 Public domain in the United States Cover source Local typographic cover created for MojiMori from public-domain source metadata

Section 44 of 93 Page 83 of 103

VELOCITY OF LIGHT.

326 words at B2 or above
A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 C2+
highlighted at or above your level

Keyboard: focus a highlighted word and press ↓ for its actions. Esc closes; Enter opens the word page.

markdown

Missing dictionary data: 7 unique words are not in the dictionary data yet. Amber marks show where they appear.

sort of shorthand method of expressing the composition of substances, which may be conveniently illustrated by the case before us. Let it be agreed that the letter N shall not only represent nitrogen, but always fourteen parts by weight—grains, ounces, &c., &c.,—of nitrogen; and that, similarly, O shall stand for sixteen parts by weight of oxygen. It is plain that the composition of the compound No. 2 may be represented by simply writing down “NO;” and that of No. 4, in which there is just double the proportion of oxygen, by “NOO.” But to avoid an unnecessary repetition of the same symbol, when it has to be taken more than once, a small figure is written after and a little below it. Thus, for OO, “O2” is written. The proportional composition of each of the five compounds will now be obvious from the following symbols: No. 1. No. 2. No. 3. No. 4. No. 5. N2O NO N2O3 NO2 N2O5 These symbols may be regarded as merely a compendious expression of the composition of each substance—as a shorthand statement of the facts of analysis. But to the majority of chemists the symbols have a deeper significance; for they are taken as representing the atoms of each element which enter into each smallest possible particle of a compound; they express a certain theory of the ultimate constitution of matter. Thus, if we suppose that there exist indivisible particles of nitrogen and of oxygen, and that each smallest particle, or molecule, of the compounds under consideration is constituted of a certain definite and invariable number of each kind of atoms; and, further, if we suppose that an atom of oxygen is heavier than one of nitrogen in the proportion of 16 to 14, or 8 to 7, we shall have a simple theoretical explanation of the relations in the proportions already pointed out. In fact, these would result from the simplest combinations of the two kinds of atoms; and we can picture each one of the smallest particles of the several bodies as thus constituted: No. 1. No. 2. No. 3. No. 4. No. 5. ● ●○ ● ○ ● ●○ ○ ○ ●○ ○ ● ●○ ○ ○○ ○ N2O NO N2O3 NO2 N2O5 The black circles represent nitrogen atoms, and the open ones oxygen 734atoms; the symbols are placed below in order that their relation to the supposed atomic constitution may be obvious at a glance. While the symbol of a compound must always accord with its percentage composition, the latter does of itself determine the symbol or formula. A number of other circumstances, which cannot here be discussed, are taken into account as evidence of the constitution of the molecule. This digression on chemical formulæ will, it is hoped, enable the general reader, who may not previously have been acquainted with them, to perceive their significance, instead of passing them over as unintelligible cabalistic letters when they occur in the following pages. With this object, it may be added that the elements, hydrogen, carbon, and chlorine, are respectively represented by H, C, and Cl; and that the proportional quantities, which are also implied in the symbols, and are those by which H, C, and Cl combine with other bodies, are 1, 12, and 35·5 respectively. Another point which should be understood is that the properties and behaviour of a chemical compound are different, and usually extremely different, from those of any of its constituents. This is well illustrated in the subject we are considering. Atmospheric air is a mixture (not a compound) of nitrogen and oxygen gases, and all its properties are intermediate between those of its ingredients taken separately. Nitrous oxide, N2O, has properties not possessed by either constituent separately. For example, it is very soluble in water, whereas oxygen is very slightly so, and nitrogen still less. The other compounds we have referred to differ widely from nitrous oxide and from each other in their properties. Nitrous oxide is an invisible gas, having a slightly sweetish taste and smell. It is dissolved by water, which, at ordinary temperatures, takes up about three-fourths of its volume of the gas. By cold and great pressure the gas may be condensed into a colourless liquid. The gas is obtained in a pure state by gently heating the salt called ammonium nitrate, which is formed by neutralizing pure nitric acid with carbonate of ammonia. The action which occurs may be explained thus: the hydrogen of the ammonium unites with a portion of the oxygen of the nitric acid, forming water, whilst the remainder of the oxygen combines with the nitrogen. As chemical actions are regarded as either separations or unions of atoms, they can be expressed by what is called a chemical equation, the left-hand side of which shows the arrangement of the atoms before the action, and the right-hand side the arrangement after it, the sign of equality being read as “produce” or “produces.” But the validity of the equations, like that of the symbolic formulæ, is quite independent of the existence of atoms; for the equation always rests on certain facts, namely, the relations between the quantities of the substances which enter into, and those which are produced by, a chemical action. Thus, in the present case the action may be symbolically expressed as follows: H4N NO3 = 2H2O + N2O Ammonium nitrate. Water. Nitrous oxide. The equation expresses the fact that every 80 parts by weight of ammonium nitrate, which are used in this reaction, split up into 36 of water and 44 of nitrous oxide. No attempt seems to have been made to turn Davy’s suggestion to practical account; but in courses of chemical lectures at the hospitals and elsewhere the peculiar physiological properties of nitrous oxide have, since Davy’s announcement, always been demonstrated by some person inhaling 735the gas. In the medical schools the students often operated on a comrade who was under the influence of nitrous oxide to the extent of bestowing sundry pinches and cuffs, which fully proved the anæsthetic qualities of the nitrous oxide. In 1818 Faraday pointed out the similarity between the effects of ether and of nitrous oxide, and from that time Professor Turner regularly included among the experiments of his course of chemistry the inhalation of the vapour of ether by one of the students. This was done by simply pouring a little ether into a bladder of air, and by means of a tube drawing the mixed air and vapour into the mouth. Until 1844 the effects of nitrous oxide and of ether vapour remained without application, although thus continually demonstrated in lectures. At the close of that year, Mr. Horace Wells, a dentist, of Hartford, Connecticut, U.S.A., witnessed the usual experiments with nitrous oxide at a public lecture. At his request the lecturer attended at Mr. Wells’s residence the following day, to administer to him the nitrous oxide, in order that he might try its efficacy in annulling pain, for he was himself to have a tooth extracted by a brother dentist. His exclamation on finding the operation painlessly over was, “A new era in tooth-pulling!” Mr. Wells continued his experiments on the use of nitrous oxide in dental operations, but he did not apparently obtain uniform results, for he pronounced its effects uncertain, and he gave it up. On the occasion when Mr. Wells’s tooth was extracted, Dr. W. T. G. Morton was present, and he soon afterwards found that under the influence of ether vapour, teeth might be painlessly extracted and surgical operations performed. Dr. Morton attempted to conceal the substance he used under the name of “letheon,” for which he obtained a patent. But the well-known and characteristic odour of ether declared the nature of the “letheon;” and Dr. Bigelow having in consequence tried ether, found it to produce all the effects of “letheon.” So the matter was no longer a secret. Dr. Morton was, therefore, the person who first applied ether vapour, and the extraction of a tooth was the occasion of its first application. This was in 1846. It was used for the first time in England on the 19th of December, 1846, also for the extraction of a tooth; and two days afterwards Mr. Liston, the eminent surgeon, performed the operation of amputating the thigh while his patient was under the influence of ether. The employment of ether in surgical operations quickly spread, and its administration in hospitals became general throughout Europe and America. The chemical constitution of ether, and its relation to alcohol, may be indicated by the following formulæ: HOH HO(C2H5) (C2H5)O(C2H5) Water. Alcohol. Ether. If we suppose one of the hydrogen atoms in the molecule of water to be removed and replaced by the group (C2H5), the result is alcohol. If, now, (C2H5) be substituted in the alcohol for the remaining atom of hydrogen, we get a particle of ether. Ether was discovered in 1540, and described as sweet oil of vitriol, but its real nature was first pointed out by Liebig. It is prepared by distilling a mixture of sulphuric acid and alcohol. It is a colourless transparent liquid, extremely volatile, and possessing a peculiar and powerful odour. It evaporates so rapidly that a drop allowed to fall from a bottle on a warm day may be converted into vapour before it reaches the ground. When its vapour is inhaled in sufficient proportion mixed with air, it soon produces a complete insensibility to pain. In the case of a full-grown man who inhales air containing 45 per cent. of the 736vapour, about 2 drams per minute of the liquid are consumed. The air is allowed to stream over the surface of the liquid in a proper apparatus, where it takes up the vapour, and the two pass through a flexible tube to a piece fitting over the mouth and nostrils of the patient. The effects produced are progressive, and may be thus described: For about two minutes after the beginning of the inhalation, the patient retains his mental faculties, and has some power of controlling his movements, but in a confused and disordered manner. At the end of the third minute he is unconscious; there are no voluntary movements, but muscular contractions may agitate the frame. At the end of the fourth minute, the only perceptible movements are the motions of the chest in respiration. If the inhalation be discontinued at the end of the fourth minute, when 1 oz. of ether will have evaporated, similar stages are passed through in reverse order during recovery. The condition reached at the end of the fourth minute continues about two minutes; the intermediate state lasts three or four minutes; the condition of confused intellect and will about five minutes. This is succeeded by a feeling of intoxication and exhilaration, which continues for ten or fifteen minutes. It was probably this excitement of the system produced by ether which has caused it to be superseded—in Britain, at least—in about twelve months after its adoption, by chloroform. Chloroform appears to have been independently discovered in 1831, by Soubeiran, and by an American chemist, Guthrie. It is usually procured by distilling a mixture of bleaching powder, spirits of wine, and water. Chloroform is a colourless volatile liquid, of an odour much more agreeable than that of ether. Its composition is represented by CHCl3. The merit of having first applied the singular properties of this substance to the alleviation of human suffering belongs to the late Sir J. Y. Simpson, of Edinburgh. Its use as an anæsthetic was apparently suggested to this eminent professor by Mr. Waldie, of Liverpool. It was first applied at Edinburgh on the 15th November, 1847; and when its efficacy had been proved, it was soon extensively used, and in Europe, at least, almost entirely superseded ether, as being more rapid and certain in its action, not producing injurious excitement, and being pleasanter to inhale. A notion prevailed that chloroform was not only more powerful in its operation than ether, but also more safe. In January, 1848, its administration, however, proved fatal to a patient; and since then a certain number of casualties of this kind have occurred with chloroform, ether, and other anæsthetics. The patient is often made to inhale the vapour of chloroform by merely holding before his mouth and nostrils a sponge or handkerchief, on which a small quantity of the liquid

Send feedback

What is this about?

Choose the closest match.

Optional — only if you'd like a reply.